Where roads alone use up the area's mobility budget
Loading map…Every plan side by side
What each pavement plan costs, and how much of the mobility budget it leaves for everything else. Select a plan to show it on the map.
So what can we do?
More homes and businesses per street means roads that pay for themselves
Cents of every property tax dollar this plan needs for roads, by type of neighbourhood. The black line is the mobility budget's share. Parks, undeveloped land and special districts such as the airport are left out.
By ward
Each ward's hexagons added up under this plan. A hexagon belongs to the ward its centre falls in, so the outlines on the map follow the hexagon grid, not the exact legal boundary. Select a ward to zoom to it.
The formulas, data sources and assumptions behind every number are on the methods page.
Road pavement only. The mobility budget also pays for , and the city budget pays for pipes, transit, parks, police and much more.
The 2026 assessment roll times the 2026 municipal tax rates. Hospitals, schools, parks and other exempt property are removed. Checked against 2025, the same method lands within about 1% of the City's reported total.
Citywide budgets are shared out by each area's paved area. Per-square-metre plans use street lengths from OpenStreetMap and widths measured on sampled streets. Main roads everyone uses are pooled citywide.
The median 2026 assessment of a single residential property, , and the municipal property tax on it.
Here, the mobility budget means mobility's share of property tax: . That is the City's own breakdown from its property tax calculator, where Mobility is 3.87% of the whole bill, or 6.6% once the provincial share is set aside. Each area is measured against what its own taxes put toward mobility. The City's full Mobility budget is larger ( in 2026) because it also draws on fees, grants and other revenue. We leave those out because property tax is the lever the city and each neighbourhood control.